B2/C1 - Paradoxes

--- Theseus' Ship Paradox

--- Grandfather Paradox

--- Hanging Paradox

--- Zeno's Paradox : Achilles and the Tortoise

--- Dichotomy Paradox:

--- Arrow Paradox:

--- Liar Paradox

--- Russell's Paradox

--- Bootstrap Paradox

--- Pinocchio Paradox

Overview

Some famous paradoxes include the Grandfather Paradox, the Liar Paradox, and Zeno's Paradoxes, particularly the Dichotomy Paradox and the Achilles and the Tortoise paradox. These paradoxes challenge logic and our understanding of concepts like time, motion, and self-reference.

Here's a more detailed look at some of them:

1. Zeno's Paradoxes: These are a set of philosophical problems that challenge our understanding of motion and infinity.

Dichotomy Paradox:

Before traversing any distance, one must traverse half the distance, and before that, half of the half, and so on. This implies an infinite number of tasks to complete a finite distance, making motion seem impossible.

Achilles and the Tortoise:

In a race, if Achilles gives a tortoise a head start, Achilles can never overtake the tortoise because he must first reach the tortoise's starting point, and by that time, the tortoise will have moved further.
Arrow Paradox:

An arrow in flight is always at a specific point in space, and at any given instant, it occupies a space equal to its length. Since nothing occupies space unless it is at rest, the arrow must be at rest, meaning it cannot be in motion.

2. Grandfather Paradox: If someone were to travel back in time and prevent their grandparents from meeting, they would not have been born, creating a contradiction.

3. Liar Paradox: A statement that says "This statement is false." If the statement is true, then it must be false, and if it is false, then it must be true, leading to a contradiction.

4. Russell's Paradox: This paradox arises when considering the set of all sets that are not members of themselves. If such a set exists, it is a member of itself if and only if it is not a member of itself.

5. Bootstrap Paradox: A paradox of time travel where an object or piece of information exists without any clear origin, seemingly appearing out of nowhere.

6. Pinocchio Paradox: A variation of the liar paradox, where Pinocchio says "My nose grows longer." If he is telling the truth, his nose should grow, but his nose only grows when he lies.

Theseus' Ship

The Ship of Theseus paradox, also known as Theseus's paradox, is a thought experiment that explores the nature of identity. It asks whether an object that has had all of its original components replaced remains fundamentally the same object. The paradox questions whether an object's identity is defined by its physical parts or by something more, like its function or history.

Here's a breakdown:

The Scenario:

Imagine a wooden ship, the Ship of Theseus. Over time, its planks rot and are replaced with new ones. Eventually, every single original plank is replaced.
The Question:

Is the newly rebuilt ship still the Ship of Theseus? If not, when did it stop being the same ship?
The Paradox:

A further complication arises if someone were to take the original, discarded planks and build a second ship using only those old parts. Which, if either, of the two ships is the "true" Ship of Theseus?

This thought experiment raises fundamental questions about identity, change, and what defines an object's essence. Is it the physical material, the form, the function, or something else entirely? Philosophical sites and educational sites have explored these ideas, considering whether an object's identity is tied to its physical parts or to something more abstract like its history or purpose.

Theseus' Ship

The Ship of Theseus paradox, also known as Theseus's Paradox, is a thought experiment that explores the nature of identity. It asks whether an object that has had all of its original components replaced remains the same object. The paradox is named after the ship of Theseus, a mythical Greek ship, where, over time, every plank was replaced. The question is, if all the original parts are replaced, is it still the same ship?

Here's a breakdown of the paradox:

The Complication:

A second ship is then constructed using all the original, discarded planks. Now, there are two ships. Which, if either, is the "real" Ship of Theseus?

The Setup:

Theseus's ship is gradually repaired by replacing each individual plank with a new one.
The Question:

After all the original planks have been replaced, is the resulting ship still the Ship of Theseus?

Philosophical Implications:

Identity over time:

The paradox raises questions about how we define identity. Is it based on material composition, or something else like form, function, or history?

Change and continuity:

It explores how things can change over time while still maintaining some sense of continuity.

Relevance to other areas:

The Ship of Theseus has implications beyond philosophy, extending to areas like art restoration, technology, and even personal identity (as our bodies are constantly replacing cells).

Possible Solutions and Interpretations:

Materialism:

Some argue that identity is defined by the physical components. If all the parts are different, it's a different ship.

Formalism:

Others argue that identity is based on the form or structure of the object. If the ship retains its shape and function, it's still the same ship.

Temporal Identity:

Some suggest that the ship is the same as long as it maintains a continuous existence, regardless of the parts.

No solution:

Some believe there might not be a definitive answer, and the paradox highlights the complexities of defining identity.

The Ship of Theseus paradox continues to be a popular thought experiment, prompting discussions about identity, change, and what it means for something to be "the same" over time.

What are your thoughts?

--- When does the ship stop being the original?

--- Which one is the original? Ship A or Ship B?

--- Why is Ship A the original? Or Why is Ship B the original?

Grandfather Paradox

The Grandfather Paradox is a thought experiment exploring the logical inconsistencies of time travel, specifically backward time travel. If someone were to travel to the past and prevent their own birth by harming a direct ancestor (like their grandfather), it creates a paradox: the time traveler wouldn't exist to travel back and prevent their own birth, thus they would exist to travel back, and so on. This creates a logical contradiction about whether the event could have happened.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

The Core Idea:

The paradox revolves around the idea that a time traveler could alter the past in a way that prevents their own existence.

The Scenario:

The classic example involves a person traveling to the past and killing their grandfather before their parent is born. This would mean the parent is never born, and therefore, neither is the time traveler.
The Paradox:

The problem arises because if the time traveler never exists, they couldn't have traveled back to kill their grandfather. This creates a contradiction: the time traveler both exists (to go back and kill their grandfather) and does not exist (because they prevented their own birth).
Implications:

The paradox challenges the idea that time travel into the past is logically possible. It raises questions about the nature of time, causality, and the possibility of altering past events.
Possible Solutions (though none universally accepted):
- Different Timelines/Multiverses: One possibility is that time travel creates a new, separate timeline or universe where the change occurs, leaving the original timeline unaffected.
Novikov Self-Consistency Principle: This suggests that the universe has a degree of self-consistency, and events will unfold in a way that prevents paradoxes from occurring according to Sunny Labh.
Closed Timelike Curves (CTCs): If time travel involves CTCs, it might be possible to interact with your past self but not necessarily change it, or to enter a different quantum branch of the universe.
Popular Culture:

The Grandfather Paradox is a common trope in science fiction, featured in works like "Back to the Future" and Ray Bradbury's "A Sound of Thunder"

The Hanging Paradox

The unexpected hanging paradox, also known as the surprise examination paradox, is a logic puzzle where a prisoner is told he will be hanged on a day next week, but the exact day will be a surprise. The paradox arises because the prisoner, using logical deduction, concludes that the hanging cannot occur on any day of the week, yet he is eventually hanged on a day that was supposed to be a surprise.

Here's how the paradox unfolds:

1. The Setup:

A judge tells a prisoner he will be hanged on one day of the following week, but the execution will be a surprise.

2. The Prisoner's Reasoning:

The prisoner reasons that the hanging cannot be on Friday. If he's still alive on Thursday, he'd know the hanging must be on Friday, thus it wouldn't be a surprise. By similar logic, he eliminates Thursday, then Wednesday, Tuesday, and Monday, concluding he cannot be hanged at all.
3. The Paradox:

The prisoner's logic seems sound, yet the executioner arrives on a day, say Wednesday, and the prisoner is hanged. This unexpected hanging contradicts his logical conclusion.

Why it's a paradox: The prisoner's logic appears flawless, but it leads to a false conclusion. This highlights a flaw in the reasoning process or a misunderstanding of what constitutes a surprise, according to some philosophical interpretations.

Possible resolutions:

Self-reference:

The judge's statement is self-referential, creating a contradiction. The prisoner's attempt to predict the surprise eliminates the possibility of the hanging being a surprise.

Knowledge and Surprise:

The paradox questions the nature of knowledge and surprise. The prisoner's attempt to know the day of the hanging negates the condition of surprise.
The nature of logic:

The paradox also challenges the limits of logical deduction, particularly when dealing with statements that involve self-reference and prediction

Zeno's Paradox : Achilles and the Tortoise

Zeno's paradoxes are a collection of philosophical problems, first presented by the Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea, that challenge the common sense notions of space, time, and motion. These paradoxes, particularly those concerning motion, demonstrate seemingly impossible situations by using infinite divisions of space and time.

Key Paradoxes:

Dichotomy Paradox:

To reach a destination, one must first cover half the distance, then half of the remaining distance, and so on, ad infinitum. This creates an infinite series of tasks, leading to the conclusion that motion is impossible.

Achilles and the Tortoise:

A slower tortoise is given a head start in a race against the faster Achilles. Before Achilles can overtake the tortoise, he must reach the tortoise's starting point. By the time Achilles reaches that point, the tortoise has moved further ahead, and this process repeats infinitely, suggesting Achilles can never catch the tortoise.
Arrow Paradox:

At any given instant, an arrow in flight is at a specific location and occupies a certain amount of space. Since it is not moving during that instant, and since the entire flight is composed of an infinite number of these instants, the arrow cannot move at all.

Resolving the Paradoxes:

Infinite Sums:

Modern mathematics, particularly calculus, provides a resolution. While the paradoxes present infinite series, the sums of these series can be finite. For example, the infinite series in the Dichotomy paradox converges to a finite distance, meaning that it is possible to traverse an infinite number of points in a finite amount of time.

Continuous Motion:

The paradoxes also highlight the difference between potential and actual infinity. While space and time can be divided infinitely, motion is a continuous process, not a series of discrete steps.

Impact:

Zeno's paradoxes have had a lasting impact on philosophy, mathematics, and physics. They continue to be studied and debated, forcing us to confront fundamental questions about the nature of reality, the structure of space and time, and the limits of human understanding

Zeno's Paradox - Achilles and the Tortoise ---.webp

External Links:

https://mappingignorance.org/2021/09/13/the-ship-of-theseus/

https://byjus.com/physics/grandfather-paradox/

https://gori70.medium.com/the-solution-of-the-paradox-of-achilles-and-the-tortoise-f618b23c25e

https://assets.cambridge.org/97805217/56136/excerpt/9780521756136_excerpt.pdf

International News Articles in English

This page contains links to interesting news articles from across the globe, The articles are separated by topic,

The City Paper Bogota

International News Articles in English List

Below is a list complied of international news articles in English. The sources will vary from country to country. The articles are separated by topi.